Matteo Lavizzari vs David Petrovic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Petrovic has been impressive with their second serve recently, winning 52.17% of points, compared to Lavizzari's 40.59%.
• Who's stronger in return games? Lavizzari edges out Petrovic by winning 45.54% of second serve return points versus Petrovic's 36.36%.
• First serve return stats favor Petrovic, who claims 37.14% of those points over Lavizzari's 26.46%.
• Lavizzari has a slight advantage under pressure, having saved 47.1% of breakpoints, while Petrovic has saved 42.86%.
• Overall match success in the past year shows Lavizzari ahead with a 62.79% win rate compared to Petrovic's 30.43%.
• In terms of surface preference, Petrovic does best on Clay with a 29% win rate, but Lavizzari excels on Indoor Hard at 67%.
• Considering player level, Lavizzari has been more successful in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments with a 62.79% win rate, against Petrovic's 30.43%.
• When facing varying opponent quality, Petrovic’s opponents have been ranked 152.65 on average, slightly stronger than Lavizzari’s at 167.63.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Lavizzari holds a clear advantage with 44% wins over Petrovic's 17%.
• Recently, Petrovic has capitalized fully on breakpoint opportunities with a 100% conversion rate, versus Lavizzari’s 40.26%.

Editorial Prediction (July 29, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming match, Petrovic’s strong recent performance on the second serve and exceptionally high breakpoint conversion rate suggest they can seize key opportunities when they arise.

However, Lavizzari demonstrates solid return game statistics and a high percentage of matches won in the past year, underlining their overall consistency and ability to endure under pressure.

Despite Petrovic's advantages in some technical areas, Lavizzari’s superior ability to perform against slightly less difficult opponents and their success on Indoor Hard courts paves the way for success.

Considering Petrovic’s struggles in deciding sets, if the match remains tight, Lavizzari’s resilience is likely to be decisive. As a result, Lavizzari is favored to win this contest.